[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: some problems with the binary distros....

From: Perry E. Metzger <perry_at_piermont.com>
Date: 2004-02-20 19:28:32 CET

kfogel@collab.net writes:
> "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> writes:
>> Okay, failing an answer on that, can someone tell me if I'm in danger
>> running in production with db4-4.0.14-0.4, because that's what I
>> picked up from that page...
>
> You're in danger of annoying space-eating (due to BDB log files). We
> have a vague fuzzy feeling that >=4.2.50 is more stable, less likely
> to require 'svnadmin recover', etc, but I don't have numbers to back
> that up, just anecdotal evidence.
>
> Go with the latest BDB, you'll be glad :-).

The problem is that I can't find any RPMs for the latest for
Red Hat 7, which is being used on the server at the moment. The
Subversion binaries pointed to off of
http://subversion.tigris.org/project_packages.html
include the older BDB, as I noted in my earlier mail, which is why
installed it that way. :(

If anyone knows where I can get similarly configured RPMs of the later
BDB, I'd appreciate it. (Of course, will the binaries I got even work
with the newer BDB? I'll probably need to recompile them, which is
what something I'd rather avoid... sigh...)

Someone should make sure the "official" binaries released with 1.0 for
each platform include the latest BDB.

-- 
Perry E. Metzger		perry@piermont.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 20 19:28:36 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.