Re: Autoprops configuration

Sander Striker wrote:

>>From: Brian W. Fitzpatrick [mailto:fitz@red-bean.com]
>>Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 9:58 PM
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 14:45, Jack Ivey wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>My concern is will the eol-style=CRLF do any harm to the handling of a
>>>>>binary file?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>You bet your buttons! It'll fry 'em up like breakfast sausages.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Fair enough, howzabout this:
>>>
>>>[auto-props]
>>>* = svn:eol-style=native
>>>*.exe = svn:eol-style=
>>>...
>>>
>>>It _seems_ to work....
>>>
>>>
>>Ah! Yes it does, but if you read the docs on autoprops in the HEAD
>>revision of the book (not the website), I don't think you can be
>>guaranteed of the order in which the rules will be run--but I'm not 100%
>>sure now that I think about it. If someone wants to look at the config
>>parser code, they can verify the truth in this.
>>
>>
>
>IIRC, it uses an apr_hash_t, and walking the contents of that
>doesn't guarantee ordering.
>
>

Yes. And changing the svn_config implementation to preserve ordering has
been on my list for some time now. The main reason to do so is, of
course, precisely so that auto-props become more predictable.

Now, if only I knew whether this could be a 1.0.1 candidate or not...

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org