[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: vendor branches?

From: Perry E. Metzger <perry_at_piermont.com>
Date: 2004-02-13 21:07:28 CET

"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> writes:
> Travis P <svn@castle.fastmail.fm> writes:
>> On Feb 13, 2004, at 11:16 AM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>>> What convention are most people using for vendor branches these days?
>>> (BTW, it would be useful to have something in the documentation for
>>> CVS users mentioning such conventions...)
>> Unless I'm missing some subtlety in your question, it's documented in
>> the book
>> "Vendor branches" http://svnbook.red-bean.com/html-chunk/ch07s04.html
> Nope, I just somehow missed that looking through the book.

Actually, I take that back. The book still doesn't make it clear what
the best convention is. Do people prefer repositoryroot/vendor,
repositoryroot/trunk/vendor, or what?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 13 21:07:47 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.