The comment implies that the information is saved. Is this just an error?
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Jim Sokoloff [mailto:jim@sokoloff.com]
Envoye : mercredi 21 janvier 2004 16:32
A : Tim Armes
Cc : 'users@subversion.tigris.org'
Objet : Re: Retrieving branch/merge information
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Tim Armes wrote:
> "When you merge a revision (or range of revisions) into your working copy,
> you'll need to remember
> them as well. If you forget any of this information, you can rediscover it
> by examining the output of svn log -v
> branch-dir"
>
> Can someone please explain where to find this information. I can easily
> find the revision from which a branch was made, but once I do a merge I'm
> unable to recover the exact details of that merge. For example, I can't
see
> that revisions 180:184 were merged into revision x on another branch.
AFAIK, that information is not saved by svn. The convention at
my company is to include that information in the commit comment.
I think the docs are implying that you can see the list of files
affected by the revisions 180:184 and have that jog your memory
that you merged 180:185, but not that svn can tell you specifically
that you did that merge.
--Jim
###########################################
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jan 21 16:35:37 2004