Glen wrote:
> Question 2 - Is about clients. Can I use a client built for say version
> 0.31.1 with a server that is 0.35.1 if I am using http:// access (i.e. I
> am NOT using file:// access). I say this because the most recent
> version of the eclipse plugin for subversion is currently linked against
> 0.31.1
I don't know about 0.31.1 with 0.35.1,
but generally we had major troubles when mixing server/client versions
(hangs during updates; costed us a lot of time before
we found out the reason).
Because of this, we STRICTLY follow the policy to always
use EXACTLY the same version for server and client.
> Question 3 - recommended clients. Should we bite the bullet and use the
> command line client or are people having success with the eclipse plugin
> or tortoise clients (those are the two that I have tried). Or is there
> another non-command line client that is more stable. My primary concern
> is stability.
Tortoise has some crashes,
but the main problem I see is the missing diff functionality.
> Question 4 - Not really a question more of a request for comments. We
> have several developer's and reliability and stability are most
> important (versus having feature X). We are switching to subversion to
> ease stress not create it ;-) Please share
> experiences/recommendations.
See my previos emails for some details.
All in all, personally I think Subversion with http://
and command-line frontend itself is very stable and relyable;
however, I didn't find a client which is ready now.
(However, because of John's hint I'm currently installing
the latest Tortoise - let's see!)
Cheers,
Folker
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 30 04:16:14 2003