On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 21:09:29 +0100, "Folker Schamel"
<schamel23@spinor.com> said:
> Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
[snip]
> > In both cases, B and C will claim to be direct descendants of A. Is
> > that really okay? In the second scenario, is it really okay that B and
> > C are siblings, rather than ancestor/descendant relationship? Doesn't
> > that bother you?
>
> No.
> In contrary, I think it SHOULD work in that way. See below.
[snip]
>
> For example, consider the following scenario:
> 1) Open a versioned text file in an text editor.
> 2) Add two lines XXX and YYY
> 3) Save the file
> 4) Delete the line XXX again
> 5) Save the file again
> 6) svn commit
> The respository (including svn log, svn diff) will contain
> EXACTLY the same result as when doing the following:
> 1) Open a versioned text file in an text editor.
> 2) Add one line YYY
> 3) Save the file
> 4) svn commit
> The local history is different, but at commit time,
> the resulting wc is the same.
[snip]
> In both cases, the result is the same at commit time,
> namely there are two new files B and C which are a copy of A.
[snip]
Well, Folker, I have to concede that you have a very good point there !
You managed to convince me :)
Bye !
François
Developer of Java Gui Builder
http://jgb.sourceforge.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 26 21:33:07 2003