Re: Proposal: svn:temporary property

John Peacock wrote:

> Had the user in wc2 updated first, the directory would have been gone,
> so the new .o could not be created, thus would not have obstructed the
> later update. QED

The user wc2 cannot update first!
The user compiled his old wc2 before the directory was deleted.
Or do you want to forbit all users that they compile their wc,
because in some distant future some-one may delete this directory??

Cheers,
Folker

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 18 18:07:15 2003