>
>Can't you just use this:
>
> http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/commands.html#cmdinclude
>
>to include the file? You might have to be more creative to wrap the
>log entries in comments. If you need to have the log for each file
>individually, you are probably out of luck doing it this way.
>
>Perhaps you could have the actual dox in files which are included in
>non-repository wrappers, which are regenerated (including the log
>entries) every time you run make. You are now officially past my
>understanding of doxygen and Makefile's... ;~)
Thanks for the Idea !
I have now a script which just calls
svn log versiondSourcefile > versiondSourcefile.log
and puts them in an unversiond directory, and with doxygen i include
this files then.
Maybe this gives mir in the end more freedom, because then i can also
use the subversion xml output make a proper xslt and get a nice table
in html .... So there is my Christmas Project ;-)
BTW are there floating around some xslt files to parse subverion putput ?
Thanks
Roland
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Dec 17 15:24:11 2003