On Dec 11, 2003, at 6:25 AM, mark benedetto king wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 08:18:31AM +0000, olczyk@interaccess.com wrote:
>> Hmm. is svk something that simply takes two repositories based
>> on a common repository and then merges the changesets?
>> Or is it a complete replacement for svn? Meaning that you must use svk
>> commands instead of svn commands?
>
> One way to think of things is that svk helps you treat a repository
> like a working copy: you can commit changes from one repository into
> another, rather than from one working copy into a repository.
>
> You must, of course, use svk commands in order to do that. When
> operating on any particular repository, the normal svn commands will
> still work.
>
> If you want to learn more, please see http://svk.elixus.org/
>
I have seen this mentioned a couple of times, though the documentation
is scarce on the above URL. Has anyone actually used svk? If so good
or bad experiences?
-Ryan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 12 19:38:18 2003