Re: code reviewing and test enforcement?

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 05:45, John Szakmeister wrote:
>>I thought the reason for 'svnadmin lstxns/rmtxns' was because it is possible
>>to have a transaction lying around. If this is no longer the case, why do we
>>still have these commands?
>
> Because
>
> 1) bugs in libsvn_repos might accidentally leave a transaction lying
> around after an error,
>
> 2) if someone uses libsvn_fs directly, then it's definitely possible to
> have a long-lived transaction.

Thanks for all the answers and discussion. I believe our team can work
out a simple workflow over svn just fine.

-- 
dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org