Thanks for clarifying PREV, I obviously need to re-read the book.
Julian Foad wrote:
> That's interesting. I don't get a segfault when I try to do a similar
> thing, but then I'm running the head version of Subversion, and the
> segfault bug might have been fixed already.
>
> ~/tmp> svn co -N file:///home/julianfoad/vcs/sandbox/
> A sandbox/eol-test
> A sandbox/f
> A sandbox/gnudiff
> A sandbox/space in name
> A sandbox/t
> A sandbox/x
> Checked out revision 47.
> ~/tmp> cd sandbox/
> ~/tmp/sandbox> svn cp -r PREV cyc foo
> svn: Tried a versioning operation on an unversioned resource
> svn: 'cyc' is not under version control
>
> In my case, "cyc" is a directory that existed in the repository up to
> revision 46 but was deleted in revision 47 (HEAD). I am assuming that
> this corresponds to your scenario.
Yes, that looks very similar.
I cannot try the new version of subversion just yet, but I can probably
make the (very small) repository and a full transcript of a reproduction
of the bug available to anyone who's interested.
--
see shy jo
Received on Mon Nov 24 01:57:11 2003