On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 09:18, John Allsup wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:27:31 -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman
> <sussman@collab.net> wrote:
>
> > You want the sort of model that bitkeeper, svk, or arch uses. It's a
> > 'decentralized repositories' design, rather than CVS or SVN's
> > centralized-repository design.
> Thanks for the suggestion, but I do _not_ want full _decentralised_
> repositaries.
> I want one single repository, and a small less-than-repository
> client-thingy to handle the little bit of decentralised repository
> design that I want. Basically I just want to have the ability to check in
> via a
> non-TCP/IP network connection with indefinate latency. Going to bitkeeper
> or arch
> is overkill.
I personally can't envision a design for this halfway-system. In my
mind, there's either 1 repository or an infinite number. I can't think
of a design for exactly 2 repositories; the result is always equivalent
to an infinite number of them.
Maybe I'm wrong, though.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 13 16:46:19 2003