[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion vs. VSS

From: Sir Woody Hackswell <woody_at_hackswell.com>
Date: 2003-11-07 19:24:45 CET

On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Wadsworth, Eric (Contractor) wrote:

> In other words, they are choosing it kind of by default. They have not
> considered features in their choice. The people I spoke with said that they
> would be open to consider alternatives to VSS. Now would be the time to
> clear my throat and say something, if something will ever be said here.
> I, for one, have never seen VSS used, but one guy on my team here says he's
> used it, and hated it. Has anyone writtem a document doing a feature
> comparison? How about a usability comparison? Is there a URL that compares
> Subversion with VSS, showing relative strengths and weaknesses? I'd like to
> have a document to pass around to a few key people (some of whom are big
> open-source fans) but I'm not qualified to write it myself, having never
> used VSS.

I'll vouch for the crappiness of VSS. It corrupts easily, and the tools MS
gives you to fix it, don't fix it. =sigh= It also gets very very slow as the
database gets larger. No atomic commits. You must lock files to edit them.
NO UNIX SUPPORT. About its only advantage that we use is file "sharing"
between projects. i.e. you update a shared file in one project, and someone
checks out the other project, they'll get the same version.

I'd even consider CVS over VSS any day.

A few comparisons:

One in Italian, if you read it:
Google translated version:


veni, vidi, vomi

Sir.Woody_at_Hackswell.com http://sir.woody.hackswell.com

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 7 20:20:59 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.