Re: svn update -N breaks working copy? (At least a little bit)

Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:

> On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 09:55, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
> > Flies and Buicks... This is pretty basic CVS-supported functionality
> > that I feel should be present in our 1.0.
>
> You think implementing --depth throughout our command-set is a "fly" of
> a problem? Really?

CVS doesn't have --depth. But it does have -N. And even when we add
--depth, we will continue to have -N as a convenient functional alias
for --depth=1. The "fly" is this recent bug involving 'svn up -N'.
Determination of the Buick is left as an exercise to the reader.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 5 17:31:08 2003