[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: ACLs: Full support in file system after 1.0? But wat about tags?

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2003-10-27 23:15:30 CET

Lev Serebryakov wrote:

>Hello, users! How are you?
>
> It will be nice to see full NTFS-like ACLs in svn filesystem. It
> will allow to manage all access rights with `svn' command, from remote
> computer, without having access to Apache's configuration or pre-commit
> hooks. It will be great, but I understand, that it could wait for
> after-1.0 phase.
>
> But one case is important, IMHO. TAGS. Ok, tag is copy of repository
> (or project in repository) in `tags' or other `well-known' part of
> tree. But tag in SCM, IMHO, should be unchangeable. After tag is
> set, no one could change it (ok, no one, but admin, may be). And now
> we have tags, which is not technically protected. It is bad, IMHO.
>
> And change Apache's config or pre-commit script after each tag
> creation is not good idea too: developer could don't have access to
> these files!
>
> May be here is any plans to add a "read-only" mark to repository?
> May be via property?
>
>
Why do you need a read-only bit *in addition* if you can get the same
behaviour with ACLs?

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Oct 27 23:18:55 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.