I re-ran my old scalablity & performance charting scripts on subversion with rev 7404 and here's
the results I got. These charts are pretty noisy and subversion is a lot faster than a year ago
when I last ran these charts so I probably need to increase the dataset sizes to look for current
scalability issues. Take these results with a grain of salt until I can get some verification
done on the results.
These were done on a AMD 1.5GHZ box running RedHat 9 Kernel 2.6-test7.
The time charts are here:
http://subversion.kicks-ass.org/perf/elapsed.html
The full results including memory footprint (RSS) are here:
http://subversion.kicks-ass.org/perf/
I'm going to re-visit my perf analysis over the next two weeks to see where subversion is at
nowadays. I plan on fixing my ra_dav scripts and adding a couple comparisons to these charts. If
there is anything you'd like to see me add to my comparisons, let me know.
I'm currently interested in investigating:
* scalability charts of property queries, gets, and sets
* changing the apples vs oranges Perforce comparisons to apples vs apples comparisons
* Linux24 vs Linux26 vs Win2K on the same machine
* ra_dav with mpm-worker vs mpm-prefork
* hard drive write cache enabled vs disabled
* repository hosted on Ext2 vs Ext3 vs Reiser4 vs JFS vs XFS vs FAT32
* WC hosted on Ext2 vs Ext3 vs Reiser4 vs JFS vs XFS vs FAT32
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 14 21:14:27 2003