Re: 0.32, the "1.0" milestone, and the 1.0 release.

At 05-10-2003 14:51, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > the C++ binding for SVN that RapidSVN(?) has is a better approach?
>
>Hmm... that's certainly worth exploring. It unfortunately means we'd
>have to maintain the C++ wrapper, the SWIG bindings of that wrapper,
>and then (probably) some addition language-specific cleanup code atop
>that. But if the C++ API coverage is superb, maybe that's not such a
>terrible thing.

I've had a quick look and like what I see.
They are patching to catch up with the API changes in 0.30.0 from
their last base line on 0.28.0. Then I'll try SWIGing their classes,
or even write a custom python extension to call their classes.

I think when 1.1 comes around it would be far better to have an
iterator version of svn_client_status rather then the callback
implementation you have.

Barry

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Oct 5 18:23:59 2003