junkio@cox.net writes:
> >>>>> "cmpilato" == cmpilato <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:
>
> cmpilato> "Steve Williams" <stevewilliams@kromestudios.com> writes:
> >> Does using the umask hack adversely affect a non-SSH or inetd
> >> svnserve process? If not, then it wouldn't hurt to use it. If it
> >> would affect them, then I'm not sure what would be done.
>
> cmpilato> That's good question to ask. If we agree that it's safe in all
> cmpilato> circumstances to use the script, it would make sense to ship and
> cmpilato> install the script with the svnserve process.
>
> If so maybe calling umask(2) directly at the beginning of
> svnserve binary, instead of shipping a wrapper, would be
> cleaner. Better yet, do it with a command line switch perhaps,
> so that situations that need it (e.g. svn+ssh) can turn it on?
Remember that we're using APR as our portability layer. umask() is a
Unix call, and I don't think there's any equivalent APR call that will
work on Win32.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 22 16:03:02 2003