"Steve Williams" <stevewilliams@kromestudios.com> writes:
> Uhh, yeah... that one. *grin*
>
> cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> > "Steve Williams" <stevewilliams@kromestudios.com> writes:
> >
> >> I'm of the opinion that svnadmin should be a wrapper script by
> >> default then in the official distributions. If this umask problem
> >> is such a big deal, why not have svnadmin as a script in the
> >> official distribution?
> >
> > You, uh, mean 'svnserve', right?
Now, to address the actual question. Actually, I have to first ask a
question -- do all uses of svnserve require the umask hack? My
understanding was that this was only a problem that only occurs in the
svn+ssh scenario, and that a non-SSH daemonized or inetd'd svnserve
process doesn't run into these umask problems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 22 08:01:42 2003