Re: "users" list is removing "Reply-To" header

Daniel Rall wrote:
> Okay, so munging of other messages was due to some necessary
> maintainence on tigris.org.

I don't understand this or Andreas' comment to which you are responding. Messages other than which? By "munging" are you referring to removal of the "Reply-To" header? And is the issue that we are talking about ("users" list consistently removing "Reply-To" headers) fundamentally affected by this, or are you just saying that some messages have also been munged for other reasons which might cause confusion when looking for evidence? I have not heard mention of other munging problems.

> Andreas Guenther <aguenther@collab.net> writes:
>
>>Messages that had to be resent because of stale mbox files will contain the list address and lead to the assumption that lists are not working the anticipated way. It would be too much effort to fix message that need to be resent to have the original sender in the Reply-To header.

If this comment was valid, then what is a "stale mbox file" on this context - an individual subscriber's mail server that is not currently accepting mail from the list server? And did you mean that "messages ... will contain the list address" in their "Reply-To" header?

- Julian

>>On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:29:56PM -0700, Daniel Rall wrote:
>>
>>>kfogel@collab.net writes:
>>>
>>>>kfogel@collab.net writes:
>>>>
>>>>>Well, if this mail has a "Reply-to: kfogel@collab.net" header, then
>>>>>everything's fine :-).
>>>>>
>>>>>(I've deliberately switched the thread from 'dev' to 'users' to test
>>>>>the latter.)
>>>>
>>>>Nope, not present, so 'users' is stripping Reply-to: headers :-(.
>>>
>>>I'm confused, I see the following header on the message I'm replying
>>>to:
>>>
>>>Reply-To: kfogel@collab.net
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 15 04:23:45 2003