Re: "users" list is removing "Reply-To" header

Messages that had to be resent because of stale mbox files will contain the list address and lead to the assumption that lists are not working the anticipated way. It would be too much effort to fix message that need to be resent to have the original sender in the Reply-To header.

-Andreas

On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:29:56PM -0700, Daniel Rall wrote:
> kfogel@collab.net writes:
>
> > kfogel@collab.net writes:
> > > Well, if this mail has a "Reply-to: kfogel@collab.net" header, then
> > > everything's fine :-).
> > >
> > > (I've deliberately switched the thread from 'dev' to 'users' to test
> > > the latter.)
> >
> > Nope, not present, so 'users' is stripping Reply-to: headers :-(.
>
> I'm confused, I see the following header on the message I'm replying
> to:
>
> Reply-To: kfogel@collab.net
> --
>
> Daniel Rall

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 14 21:49:17 2003