[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Re: Bug: SubWCRev flags faulty

From: <webpost_at_tigris.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 23:36:37 -0800 (PST)

Thanks for the bugfix!

> > About "in SVN": In my opinion this flag means that all items are under
> > version control, except those ignored, which usually are ignored for a
> > reason. If you don't want to change that flag, please add a new one "in
> > SVN or ignored".
> "inSVN" means that the item is versioned. Ignored items are not under
> version control, so that flag must not be set for ignored items.
> Not sure why you would need a flag for "ignored" - they're ignored for a
> reason.
I should have clarified this more: I referred to "in SVN" regarding folders. Does this flag actually make sense on folders?
However, I thought that it would be nice to know if all files in that folder are either in SVN or ignored, so that you don't have any unversioned items. That's the background of my question.
But this status should be covered by "WCUNVER" already, so I assume that "in SVN" on folders is useless.



To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2017-03-06 08:48:34 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.