Re: Problem tracking merges with retroactive branch
From: zhongyafan99 <fanyazhong999_at_foxmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:30:12 +0800
Hello:
------------------ Original ------------------
I have a branch "Foo" where source code for a derivative product (derived from the "Bar" product in the trunk) are tracked. Foo Version 5 was being developed, then stopped while new features and bug fixes for Foo Version 6 were added. I now want to create a branch for Foo Version 5 off a revision before Foo Version 6 feature commits were made, so I can merge just the bug fixes. When I create the FooV5 branch and bring up the revision log for Foo from the merge dialog, it shows no revisions unless I uncheck stop on copy/rename. When I uncheck, all revisions are grayed out as if they were merged, even though they have not been. I can select a revision and merge it, and all works as it should, but all revisions before the FooV5 branch commit are considered merged. Revisions after the branch are not grayed out.
I did find there were some files in sub directories with merge info in their properties - could this be the source of the problem, and is there a way to fix? Or is there some other way I should be doing this?
I thought I had used this process before without problems.
Thanks - Ben
------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org]. |
This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.