Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com> wrote on 08/13/2013 01:12:57 PM:
> From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
> To: users_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org
> Date: 08/13/2013 01:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Revert or update to Issue 285: externals: prevent
> commit of pegged externals?
>
> On 13.08.2013 21:18, Dan Ellis wrote:
> >
> > Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com> wrote on 08/13/2013 11:20:43 AM:
> >
> > > From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
> > > To: users_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org
> > > Date: 08/13/2013 11:21 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Revert or update to Issue 285: externals: prevent
> > > commit of pegged externals?
> > >
> > > On 13.08.2013 17:08, Dan Ellis wrote:
> > > > Hello everyone,
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Issue 285 was added to prevent a commit when an external had a
> > > > > pegged revision (only allowed for HEAD).
> > > > >
> > > > > I believe we should allow commits when the peg revision is the
same
> > > > > as the HEAD revision. I'm ok with preventing commits to
pegged
> > > > > revisions that are not the same as the HEAD. This makes some
sense,
> > > > > although seems a little bit over-protective.
> > >
> > > if you peg to HEAD, then why even add a peg revision?
> > > If you peg to a specific revision, then it won't be HEAD anymore
when
> > > you do the commit.
> > So what about making the option to prohibit committing of pegged
> > revisions a feature that can be turned on/off via the Settings option?
> > This allows behavior consistent with previous versions but also
> > provides a safety net for those not wanting that feature?
> >
> > I hope this clarifies a bit more. let me know!
>
> http://code.google.com/p/tortoisesvn/source/detail?r=24662
Stefan,
Thank you very much. I appreciate it.
Dan
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=3062583
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2013-08-13 22:32:51 CEST