On 31.01.2012 15:19, Franz Hirschbeck wrote:
> I discovered a similar problem today.
> Client: 1.7.4
>
> My Repo looks like this:
> Apps/ScanMan/ (trunk/branches/tags)
> ExternalLibs/UnxUtils/Release1
>
> There is a directory Apps/ScanMan/trunk/ExternalLibs with the svn:externals:
> ^ExternalLibs/UnxUtils/Release1 UnxUtils
>
> The log of ExternalLibs/UnxUtils/Release1:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r2745 | marcelb | 2011-03-29 18:15:22 +0200 (Di, 29 Mrz 2011) | 2 lines
>
> ExternalLibs
> - renamed UnxTools to UnxUtils
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r2740 | marcelb | 2011-03-29 16:34:30 +0200 (Di, 29 Mrz 2011) | 2 lines
>
> ExternalLibs
> - added UnxTools 14-04-03
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> When I create a tag the dialog "Set explicit revision for these
> externals" has an entry for UnxUtils with the revision 2740.
>
> I expect this revision to be 2745. I guess there is a bug in the
> determination of the last change.
>
> Can anyone of the developer confirm this?
It's not really a bug: the revision of the externals is determined by
examining the working copy. The revision shown/used for this is the
highest revision of any item (file or folder) in the external.
If you haven't updated your working copy after r2745, then the external
your working copy is on is still on an older revision - and that's also
what you want to tag since that's the revision you've did all the
testing with.
Stefan
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2913670
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2012-01-31 21:21:21 CET