Just to let you know, I weighed my alternatives and finally chose to stay
with 1.7 :-)
Having said that and for the record - I never worked with Visual Studio. I
used _svn folders because I COULD (i.e. tsvn allowed me to).
Of course if there's a TECHNICAL reason to refrain from it, I'd love to
hear it.
But deciding for me that I SHOULDN'T is condescending and reminds me of how
some software corporate we all know behaves.
Thank you for your consideration!
~ Amnon.
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Andy Levy <andy.levy_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 05:29, Kurt Pruenner <leak_at_gmx.at> wrote:
> >
> > On 26.12.2011 03:38, Dale McCoy wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 09:50, Targumon (Amnon Sadeh) <
> targumon_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > In TSVN 1.6.x there was an option (in the general settings section)
> to use
> > > > "_svn" instead of ".svn" directories.
> > > > Can't find it in 1.7.x - where did it go?
> > >
> > > That setting is gone.
> >
> > But the environment variable it toggled is still there:
> >
> > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.3.html#_svn-hack
> >
> > And I'm still using it - I'm not sure I agree with the assumption Stefan
> > made that noone is "still seriously using VS.Net" - what else would I
> > use to work on legacy .NET 1.1 apps?
>
> Use MSBee? http://msbee.codeplex.com/
>
> > I sure as heck don't want to port any app that I have to make a small
> > change on to .NET 4
>
> Newer releases of Visual Studio can still target older versions of the
> Framework. That said, eventually you *do* have to move forward. MS
> allows you to get away with running really old software but that
> doesn't mean it's always advisable to do so.
>
> > - and there's still that abomination called the "SAP
> > .Net Connector" *spit* that requires both Visual Studio 2003 *AND* Java
> > to be able to use it's designer part as it was never updated for
> > anything beyond VS2003... :(
>
> Here's what SAP says about working with Visual Studio 2005:
>
> http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/92333e6b-0b01-0010-9cbf-fecd62d6c895?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
>
> Or it may be worthwhile to look at other ways to connect to the
> back-end like http://www.theobald-software.com/en/products/erpconnect.htm
>
> Or you can migrate your SAP back-end to their SOA architecture (see
> http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/14331 ). You'll
> have to do it eventually, I imagine.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2900185
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [
> users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2903461
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2012-01-01 16:41:46 CET