Good news, i'll try TortoiseSVN 1.7
2011/7/28 Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 13:39, Felix Saphir
> <felix.saphir_at_kantarmedia.com> wrote:
> > Am 28.07.2011 10:00, schrieb Igor Paliychuk:
> >>
> >> And the last. As i understand problem is in BOM? If it's present text is
> "in
> >> all cases" interpreted as UTF. But if there is no BOM codepage can be
> >> detected wrongly. Right?
> >
> > Aside from the original issue: a BOM is not necessary for detecting
> > UTF-8, because it's a plain byte stream. The presence of a BOM can even
> > cause various problems, so it should never be used for UTF-8.
>
>
> Just to save you some time writing more posts about this:
> I've tested this with the upcoming 1.7 version (you can try the 1.7
> beta if you like) and it works there correctly.
>
> So I won't put any energy/time/work into this anymore, since 1.7 will
> be released really soon...
>
> Stefan
>
> --
> ___
> oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
> (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
> \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
> /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2805271
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [
> users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2805280
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2011-07-28 14:42:21 CEST