Re: Estimate effort to write toroiseSVNSCC client

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Roman Kellner <muzungu_at_gmx.net> wrote:
> Currently we use PushOk as the SCC2SVN client but also need a Wrapper
> library around PushOk to avoid interface bugs between the IDE leading to
>
> Either
> we extend our Wrapper bypassing PushOk and using svn direktly for certain
> SCC commands or

Since you already have a wrapper around PushOk, I think you could
modify it to use TortoiseProc for most of the actual operations, but
PushOk for populating information to provide to VS.

On the other hand, do you really need to see version control status
inside VS? Years ago, I setup TortoiseProc as a command line version
control provider in VS. It worked quite well. Of course, VS had no
access to the status information, but the team I was working with at
the time did not care.

------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2766280

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2011-06-15 18:53:13 CEST