[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: What's the best practice of such merge situation?

From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:58:50 +0200

On 22.07.2010 12:08, albert kong wrote:
> I have a MFC dialog project in the trunk and a branch, the branch implement
> some features to fulfill a client's unique request.
> In the branch I edit so many in resource design. Now I add a paramount
> function to the branch, both edit the dialog resource and code. I need to
> integrate this change to trunk also, I found merge the resource file now is
> a disaster. I had to repeate the UI change again manually.
> According your experience, what's the best design or practice in such
> situation?
> Hope I express it clearly!

Merging the rc files is difficult at best. And if you're using VS2010
then those files are stored in UTF-16 format which means svn will mark
them as binary files and won't even attempt to merge them.

Since merging those files is hard to do, we don't do it: in TSVN we
don't merge changes back to the stable branch that have resource changes
- not just because of the merging though, also because it would leave
the translations with English strings.

Stefan

-- 
        ___
   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2637978
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2010-07-25 17:59:14 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.