On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:20, Felix Saphir <felix.saphir_at_kantarmedia.de> wrote:
> Andy Levy schrieb:
>> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 02:42, Alexander <lazybadger_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Jul 17, 5:12 am, Mukund <kmukun..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I suggest that tortoise svn binaries be source controlled by
>>>> subversion so that i can simply say SVN update on C:\Program
>>>> Files\TortoiseSVN\ to update the current working copy instead of
>>>> opening a browser and reinstalling the application
>>>
>>> STRONGLY disagree
>>> 1. Repo for binaries will be giant size very soon
>>> 2. It's harder to support on user's side
>>> 3. Hand-made operation have better manageability
>>> 4. HTTP file-dowloads are(?) more bullet-proof than svn update for
>>> single big file
>>
>> 5. In a corporate environment, we want to have full control over what
>> updates to what software are pushed out when.
>
> But if the file size was displayed, users would instantanenously know
> what's been changed. Or if any backup files were checked in.
I think you're in the wrong thread.
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2634435
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2010-07-17 14:34:58 CEST