Re: not "the usual" missing icon overlay question

Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:

>Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>> Stefan Küng wrote:
>>> On 25.05.2010 08:43, Lorenz wrote:
>>>> Stefan Küng wrote:
>>>>> On 21.05.2010 15:45, Lorenz wrote:
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>> Until recently that was possible by unticking all drive type options
>>>>>> and adding the respective paths to the include list.
>>>>>> That is, a check mark in the drive typs section had the same
>>>>>> result as
>>>>>> adding all drive roots of the respective type to the include list.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That doesn't seem to work any longer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To get what I want, I now additionally need to check 'Fixed drives'
>>>>>> and 'Network drives' and add all drive roots to the exclude list.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, you now have to allow the drive type to make this work.
>>>>
>>>> Ok. That explains what I'm seeing, and I can get the desired behaviour
>>>> back by adjusting my configuration.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a compulsory reason for this change?
>>>>
>>>> I found the old behaviour much more convenient - especially in cases
>>>> where you want icon overlays only on a small number of directorys
>>>> scattered over a small part of the local and remote drives present.
>>>
>>> Maybe Stefan^2 knows more about the why.
>> Looks like a that feature got removed accidentally.
>> I should be able to fix that coming weekend.
>>
>> -- Stefan^2.
>>
>>
>Should be fixed in r19639.
>Please report back when there is still a problem.
>
>-- Stefan^2.

thank you.

I won't be able to test the fix though (at least not in the near
future).

-- 
Lorenz
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2615154
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].