[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Repository migration between different access methods

From: Simon Large <simon.tortoisesvn_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:25:06 +0100

2009/9/2 Andy Levy <andy.levy_at_gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 08:47, el_es<el.es.cr_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Btw, which method of access is :
>> -faster at local network level (comparable to samba file transfer) (I gather,
>> WebDAV?)
>
> In descending order of speed:
> file:/// (but this should never be used over a network or with more than 1 user)
> svn://
> http://
> https://
> svn+ssh:// (I may be wrong on the position of this one)
>
>> - secure at the outside access (Webdav over https?)
>> at the same time ?
>
> https or svn+ssh

or svn with SASL, which should be easier to set up. I documented the
basics for a Windows server, but not sure how easy it is on a Linux
server.

>> - easier to set up than svn:+ssl (WebDAV+https?)
>
> svn+ssh is the trickiest to setup IMHO. https is probably the best mix
> of security & simplicity.

Simon

-- 
:       ___
:  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
: (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
:   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
:   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2390261
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-02 17:25:28 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.