No, I use TortoiseSVN 1.5.3, Build 13783 (Subversion 1.5.2), that's
why it worked... I see.
Here is my svn command line client version:
svn, version 1.6.2 (r37639)
compiled May 16 2009, 13:25:31
I don't get the tree conflict principle. According to you, should I
get a conflict with 'file1' during the merge?
On Jun 17, 11:36 am, Stefan Küng <tortoise..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 20:34, monoc<frederic.vi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Sefan, no doubt that I used svn 1.6.2.
>
> > I downloaded svn, version 1.5.4 (r33841) and I tried again my test
> > case. It works perfectly fine and I got the expected result:
> > $> svn merge svn://xxx/svn/trunk --dry-run
> > --- Merging r4 through r5 into '.':
> > A file2
>
> > I think there is definitely a regression with 1.6.x. I will raise a
> > ticket to the team.
>
> svn 1.5.x doesn't support tree conflicts, that's why it works with
> such a client, that's not a regression.
>
> Do you use TSVN 1.6.2 to compare the merges with your svn client?
>
> Stefan
>
> --
> ___
> oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
> (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
> \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
> /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
>
> ------------------------------------------------------http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMess...
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscr..._at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2362951
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-06-17 20:49:13 CEST