[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Three comments on RecursiveLogRev

From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 20:13:25 +0200

Simon Large wrote:
> 2009/6/6 Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>:
>> Simon Large wrote:
>>> I'm still a bit unclear on this. What happens if the registry key is
>>> not defined (in 1.6.x and on trunk).
>> It isn't used anymore in trunk.
>
> OK, understood. But there is a new key LogStatusCheck which disables
> the crawl if explicitly set to 0?

Yes.

>> In 1.6.x, a value of 2 means the revision is read only for the item the
>> log is shown for, otherwise the revision is read recursively (the same
>> as SubWCRev does).
>
> So if the registry key is set to 2 is non-recursive. If it has any
> other value or does not exist then there is a WC crawl. That sounds
> like exactly the same behaviour as trunk, but with a different key
> name and value.

And if it is 0, there is no crawl at all:
0 - no crawl
1 - recursive
2 - only the item itself

But it's not the same as on trunk. On trunk, this is done in a separate
thread, while on 1.6.x, the log entries won't show up until the crawl is
done.

Stefan

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2360002
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].

Received on 2009-06-06 20:13:36 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.