Re: Three comments on RecursiveLogRev

Mark Irving wrote:

> (2) If I set RecursiveLogRev to 2 (because I have a large working
> copy), I don't always see any revision highlighted for a folder. It
> seems that this happens where the log messages for my working copy do
> not include the exact revision to which it was updated: for example,
> for a branch after a later commit has been made to the trunk.
> Right-click folder, TortoiseSVN > Show Log. I see this at present,
> for example, in a working copy of
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.6.x -- and the behaviour
> is different for show log of a file.

the revision that's marked is taken from the (recursive if set in the
registry) folder/file you right-clicked on to show the log. For files,
that's the last committed revision.

> (3) It might be nice if I could set the RecursiveLogRev behaviour for
> each of my working copies. For big projects with thousands of files
> and folders, I want RecursiveLogRev=2, but on small projects I would
> prefer the default of RecursiveLogRev=1.

On trunk, the status check to get the revision is done in a separate
thread, so you shouldn't even notice it anymore even with big working
copies - the log dialog automatically refreshes after the thread has
finished and the revision is known. This means it won't first show the
revision in bold until the thread is finished and the revision is known,
but after that's done, the revision will change to bold.

Stefan

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2359941
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].