Thanks. We certainly don't have working copies the size of the linux
kernel.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Justin Johnson wrote:
> > Is the leak only on Windows and only for commit?
> >
> > Are the temp file performance issues new with 1.6?
> >
> > I'm planning an enterprise deployment of Subversion/TortoiseSVN 1.6.2
> > and am trying to determine the impact of moving forward with the
> deployment.
>
> If you really have *very* big working copies, I'd wait for 1.6.3. But if
> you have 'normal' sized working copies, you can savely use 1.6.2 - we
> never noticed this before, and the TSVN working copy is quite big too.
>
> Stefan
>
> --
> ___
> oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
> (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
> \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
> /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2359742
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [
> users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2359814
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-06-05 21:43:31 CEST