> Mubasher Hanif wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the kind reply and providing us updates about new SVN. I
> > really appreciate when people do follow up with their threads.
> >
> > OK, lets work together instead of suggesting each other different
> > things and going into details of what you said and what I said.
> >
> > What do you think what evidence I can provide in such situation.
> > Please advice!
> >
> > I will be happy to work with you to sort out this problem.
>
> There's not much you can do besides configure your McAffee scanner to
> not interfere.
>
> What has changed in the svn library is that newer versions do more with
> the files inside the .svn folders (and the working copy files too). For
> example, the permissions on the files are now set explicitely. I guess
> that's what your virus scanner interprets as "bad" and interferes. But
> that's not really bad but required.
>
> But that's why you can configure a virus scanner to exclude certain
> locations - use that feature of your scanner, because that's what it is
> there for.
>
> There is no way that Subversion would change the way it treats its *own*
> files just because of a virus scanner.
>
> Stefan
>
> --
> ___
> oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
> (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
> \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
> /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
Alright, Thanks Stefan!
--
Mubasher
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=1268531
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-03-04 22:06:36 CET