>> Do you have any information to substantiate this claim? The cache has
>> been in use by thousands of users for the last couple of years. We
>> would never claim that it is bug-free, but most people consider it a
>> useful feature.
>
> Over the last few months I've probably run into around a dozen separate
> issues. The one I ran into yesterday that prompted to look through bug
> reports is that safely unmounting eSATA drives in Vista doesn't work until
> you kill the tsvncache process. I've also run into the issue in the past
> with TrueCrypt volumes not unmounting correctly. I'll try to make a
> benchmark for it, but some applications that are extremely directory access
> heavy can see enormous slowdowns when tsvncache is running in the
> background. Have also run into issues when trying to delete directories and
> having it fail until you kill the tsvncache processes (I noticed from the
> mailing list traffic that it's possible that this has since been fixed).
> One proprietary application that I've had to use included a minifilter
> driver that watched for directory and file timestamp changes and it had
> problems operating until the tsvncache processes were killed. At the moment
> I cannot remember what the other various problems were off the top of my
> head, but they will probably come to me if I think about it more.
>
Just ran into another case on a machine that didn't have TSVNCache
disabled. Renaming a directory that contains a folder with an svn
repository in it fails with access denied because of the TSVNCache
process holding an open file handle to it.
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=1136231
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-02-11 07:03:30 CET