2009/1/27 behle <azverkan_at_yahoo.com>:
> I've been reading through some of the discussion about TSVNCache regarding
> all of the various issues with safely unmounting volumes, removal of
> directories, and various other problems you run into due to applications
> holding open handles for extended periods of time.
> With all the problems you run into with having it enabled, I was a bit
> shocked to find that there are zero open bugs in the bug tracker. There
> also doesn't seem to be any recent traffic on the users@ or dev@ list
> related to it. Is there a page listing all of the known problems with
> TSVNCache somewhere?
The only known issue is that on some PCs the cache takes a lot of CPU
time when it first starts up, and there is not a lot that can be done
about that - the working copy crawl is an intensive task. There have
been other vague reports of problems, but without details it is
impossible to pin anything down. There are also problems caused by
virus scanners, but again nothing we can do about it.
> It certainly seems like the feature is too buggy at the moment to be enabled
> by default, or at least there should be an installation prompt asking the
> user if they want it enabled and providing them with the list of known
> problems that their operating system is going to have with it enabled (even
> if they don't use tortoisesvn on a daily basis, just having it enabled
> causes various problems with the operating system).
Do you have any information to substantiate this claim? The cache has
been in use by thousands of users for the last couple of years. We
would never claim that it is bug-free, but most people consider it a
: oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
: (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
: \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
: /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-01-27 10:44:48 CET