RE: TSVNCache should run at a lower priority
From: <ms72_at_inf.tu-dresden.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 01:06:50 -0800 (PST)
> Mirko Seifert wrote:
I'm running TSVNCache at low priority (manually) for quite a while and I did not recognize icons that show a wrong state.
As far as I understand the implications of process priorities, the icons should only be delayed if there is processes running at a higher priority than TSVNCache. This is usually the case for all user applications (e.g., the explorer itself). From my perspective these processes are more important than up-to-date icons. If I can't open directories, because my explorer is blocked by TSVNCache the icons do not buy me anything. I have collegues who actually uninstalled TortoiseSVN just because of this behavior.
If you think lowering the priority is not appropriate for all users, then how about a configuration option in the settings dialog?
------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
|
This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.