[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: tsvn and the mbr

From: Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen <lasse_at_vkarlsen.no>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:06:55 +0100


But anyway, as with all file systems, you always have the potential for
corrupted data. NTFS should be *reasonable* safe with the journaling system,
but I have known disks to go bad due to a power failure at the right(?)

Backup + ups is the way to go if you absolutely cannot live with this

I am wondering if berkeley db repositories would suffer from the same
chance, as less in the directory tables is rewritten at any one time, since
everything is contained in a db. You're still risking the possibility that
the database itself would go corrupt, so there is no way to be sure unless
you make sure.

On Feb 13, 2008 10:58 AM, Kurt Pruenner <leak_at_gmx.at> wrote:

> Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen wrote:
> > MFT, is this FAT?
> No. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS#Metafiles )
> --
> Kurt Bernhard Pruenner --- Haendelstrasse 17 --- 4020 Linz --- Austria
> .......It might be written "Mindfuck", but it's spelt "L-A-I-N".......
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org

Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Received on 2008-02-13 12:07:10 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.