Stefan Küng wrote:
> Robert Roessler wrote:
>> This is on XP SP2 with nightly TSVN 1.4.99 11790... note that the
>> 11652 nightly worked fine (and I am going back to it, since I miss my
>> TSVN).
>> ...
>> My two problems are that a) NO overlays show up (with or without
>> settings changes in the overlay setup dialog), and b) when I ask for a
>> revision graph from the context menu of a WC file or folder, I get a
>> weird "Go offline?" dialog, which if I blow off, leads to a "No such
>> revision" complaint, citing a rev# 1 HIGHER than anything in my repo.
Notice that I have two problems, the second of which I find more
disturbing - since I know you are currently changing the way overlays
work and interact with other T* apps.
>> ...
>> My registry: this doesn't seem to quite match what Stefan says should
>> be there (?), but here is what I have:
>>
>> 3 items unrelated to T*
>> 7 items from TCVS (TortoiseCVS[0-6])
>> 9 items from TSVN (Tortoise{Added,Conflict,Deleted et al}
>
> The 10 items before TSVN are using up almost all slots. Since I don't
> know which ones then get loaded from the TSVN handler, you might only
> get the conflict or modified handler instead of the 'normal' one.
So with the older nightly (11652) back, I now have:
7 items from TSVN ([1-7]TortoiseSVN)
3 items unrelated to T*
7 items from TCVS (TortoiseCVS[0-6])
But it seems I have not communicated the situation, my concerns, or
both... the older nightly coexists perfectly with TCVS, so it seems
introducing a change which breaks that peaceful coexistence is not a
good thing. ;)
Is the precise ordering in the registry important? Is that why you were
using the [1-7]TortoiseSVN names - to preempt TCVS? :)
Robert Roessler
robertr_at_rftp.com
http://www.rftp.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on 2008-01-06 10:22:50 CET