[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: TSVNCache questions

From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-11-21 19:37:23 CET

Robert Roessler wrote:

> As I said, "by observation" - perhaps I should have specified "of the
> program's behavior". In any case, that is my point - for the patterns
> specified above, the if at line 274 will give the same result as the if
> complex at line 264. We can also mention that the "I->size() && " is

No. It's not the same string comparison. One is with 'n', the other
isn't. The * is needed to include subfolders.

> not needed in line 274, since the check at line 262 already guarantees
> !I->empty()

True, but better be safe than sorry :)

Stefan

-- 
        ___
   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 21 19:37:39 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.