Re: hiccups by patch program?

Markus Elfring wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wish you a happy new year.
>
> I have found the article "http://gnuarch.org/gnuarchwiki/Process_*.rej_files"
> that references experiences by Miles Bader. I find his statement "Applying a
> hunk from diff-mode sometimes succeeds where patch failed." interesting in my
> case. Can XEmacs perform an update really better than the other usual tool in
> any special situations?
>
> Can a package of reject files be converted by the filterdiff program into
> another patch set for a second try if anything went unexpectedly wrong?
> How much may I trust the applicability of patches that were generated by
> TortoiseSVN 1.4.1.7992 compared to other command line tools?
>
> I ask because the technical details might be relevant for the open issue
> "Improve const-correctness" (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8160) with the
> Asterisk software. Would you to share any more ideas for a solution to the
> observed obstacle?

http://issues.tortoisesvn.net/?do=details&id=241

Stefan

-- 
        ___
   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org