[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: hiccups by patch program?

From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-01-02 19:23:55 CET

Markus Elfring wrote:
> Hello,
> I wish you a happy new year.
> I have found the article "http://gnuarch.org/gnuarchwiki/Process_*.rej_files"
> that references experiences by Miles Bader. I find his statement "Applying a
> hunk from diff-mode sometimes succeeds where patch failed." interesting in my
> case. Can XEmacs perform an update really better than the other usual tool in
> any special situations?
> Can a package of reject files be converted by the filterdiff program into
> another patch set for a second try if anything went unexpectedly wrong?
> How much may I trust the applicability of patches that were generated by
> TortoiseSVN compared to other command line tools?
> I ask because the technical details might be relevant for the open issue
> "Improve const-correctness" (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8160) with the
> Asterisk software. Would you to share any more ideas for a solution to the
> observed obstacle?



   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 2 19:24:01 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.