On 7/30/06, Chris Ormerod <email@example.com> wrote:
> Apart from the obvious "social" problem as described in the last paragraph
> of this message by Simon Large:
> http://svn.haxx.se/tsvnusers/archive-2006-06/0023.shtml (i.e. someday
> somebody will overwrite a file in the WC at the same time as somebody else),
> are there any technical issues related to sharing a SVN repository in this
> Following a dramatic start to our first ASP.Net project (a *lot* of code was
> accidentally overwritten while they were working locally and copying to dev
> for testing), I managed to convince the other devs here to give SVN a go, it
> worked brilliantly and we have been using SVN for the SQL scripts, ASP.Net
> sites and .Net applications we develop for just on a year and it is working
> Now that SVN has proved itself we want to now add our ASP classic sites to
> SVN - at the moment these are worked on directly on the dev server either
> via FTP or shared drive access. So obviously we already have the problem of
> people overwriting other peoples work, but at least using SVN will give us
> the ability to at least go back and see what the other persons work was.
> We have tested using TSVN on a networked WC and it *seems* to work fine and
> from the research I have done on the net I actually haven't found any
> references to "Using a networked WC screwed up my source code". So I thought
> I would just check here to be sure.
Doing this is generally discouraged. You really aren't too far from a
non-SVN "solution" here - If I have an editor that doesn't check for
updates on a file before saving, it's really, really easy to clobber
another developer's work, and unless things were checked in, you
*can't* go back and look. You aren't saving yourself much here.
Honestly, if you're going to share a WC amongst developers, I don't
see much of a reason to spend the time and resources setting up an SVN
server & repository.
Why does everyone have to work off the same networked WC? At a
previous job, we had both classic ASP and .NET projects, and
*everyone* had a local copy to work with, even before we started using
source control. No one ever worked on a shared copy of anything.
> As a discussion point, how do others work on ASP classic (or PHP etc) sites
> and manage to merge SVN into the workflow?
I manage a JSP/servlet web application, and SVN isn't "merged into the
workflow" - SVN *is* the workflow. If a file isn't in SVN, it isn't
in the application. No code is edited outside the developer's
sandbox. Builds are deployed from SVN into the various server
environments, and it's a one-way street - things go from SVN out to
the servers, and never from the servers back into SVN. All changes
must originate with the developer and go through the stages in SVN.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
For additional commands, e-mail: email@example.com
Received on Mon Jul 31 05:07:17 2006