RE: 26!!!

Tobias Schäfer wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 July 2006 10:44, Jean-Marc van Leerdam wrote:
>
>> Hmm, it looks like the moment(s) chosen to update the translation
>> status page are not completely unbiased ;-)

Not at all ;-)
 
> Since revision 7053 he is not up to date either :-)

Thanks for the hint. Seems like a few postings to the dev and users list got
lost on their way to my PC.
Up tp date again in r7055...

>> BTW, for how long do we want to keep languages listed if there are no
>> active updates being made to it? I think a translation percentage
>> below 60% does not really qualify as an active translation (unless
>> it's being translated right now)
>
> Translations which are currently not maintained should be
> marked as such.
> Removing them completely wouldn't be that good because having
> a basis might
> encourage someone to take over the job of translating.

I wouldn't remove any translation for exactly that reason. Non-fuzzy
translations still work, so someone downloading a Norwegian translation
(which IIRC hasn't been updated for more than a year), will still have some
correct strings available.

Currently the latest commit date is displayed on the SF Web site, but that
also changes when I update the copyright at the beginning of each year. I
could try to extract the latest change date from the .po file and use it to
highlight translations that have not been updated for more than three
months.

Cheers
- Lübbe

--
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org