Re: Status information -- needs a better solution
From: Sven Probst <sven.probst_at_ilt.fraunhofer.de>
Date: 2006-02-02 22:50:36 CET
Stefan Küng schrieb:
> The problem with *every* status indication is that as soon as it's
You are right, the principle problem of parallel unsynchronised
> Depending on the size of a working copy, fetching the status can take
I disagree here. If a directory is completely checked and you didn't get
> About the file change notifications: the cache already uses those. As
( as long as it does this, it should display "unknown")
> So, for 'normal' sized working copies (I take the TSVN working copy as
I didn't imagine this process being so fast because I have been using
Thank you for your detailed answer !
Kind regards
-- ---------------------------------------------------------- # Dipl.-Ing. Sven Probst # Fraunhofer Institut f. Lasertechnik # Steinbachstr. 15, D-52074 Aachen, Germany. # Tel : + 49 (0) 241 8906 314 # Fax : + 49 (0) 241 8906 121 # EMail : sven.probst@ilt.fraunhofer.de # WWW : <http://www.ilt.fraunhofer.de> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.orgReceived on Thu Feb 2 22:50:46 2006 |
This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.