Re: [tortoisesvn] r23145 committed - Add optional "force" options to scripts. If set,...
From: Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 19:34:22 +0200
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
I agree that executing commands from the repository content is
* hook settings via tsvn:* properties will always require user approval
This should eliminate the attack vector of some outside committer
Locally configured hooks are as trustworthy as the hook content itself.
> Is there a specific reason you implemented this?
I've got that from customers (even prior to WANdisco): The hook
A "force" option would work perfectly in 1.7.x as it simply hides
-- Stefan^2.
-- Join us this October for Subversion Live 2012 – 2 full days of training, networking, live demos and more! 25% off before Aug. 10th with discount code “earlybird.” Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download ------------------------------------------------------ http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757&dsMessageId=2997610 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].Received on 2012-08-09 19:35:03 CEST |
This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.