[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: version numbering

From: Oto BREZINA <otik_at_printflow.eu>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:48:12 +0200

On 2012-04-15 16:19, Oto BREZINA wrote:
> On 2012-04-15 11:37, Stefan Küng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Currently, the TSVN version is 1.7.6 while svn is at 1.7.4. So we're two
>> micro versions apart.
>> This apparently causes some problems on the svn mailing lists.
>> It was suggested that svn therefore would skip two micro versions for
>> their next release to catch up with TSVN, but that suggestion was
>> rejected. Instead TSVN should instead change its version numbering to
>> avoid confusion.
>> The discussion on the svn dev list is here:
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/135106
After geting thru that mailing list.
What is real purpose of forth digit ? Usualy it is usefull to have there
revision when two branches let say 1.6.x and 17.x are maintaing at same
time to have kind of time stamp to compare relative date between them. I
don't think this is our siruation so we may remove forth number ?
If we can I would sugest go to (or as next release, and
increment 4th digit until svn 1.7.8 and get (or

other note, maybe you remember this thread

There was quite interesting point. TSVN 1.7.0 had a lot of new awaited
features against 1.6.x. But we waited for svn to release them.
In this situation it may be ribbon, maybe editing of both panels in near
future. Will we wait with releasing again for svn 1.8 or change versioning?

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2012-04-15 16:48:30 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.