On 2011-05-16 10:55, Lübbe Onken wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Just to throw in my 2 cent about path shortening. Are we talking about
> URL/path to the repository in all cases? Because some dialogs (e.g.
> the log dialog) show the local working copy path in the title. This
> should be consistent IMHO and I vote for the repository URL/path and
> not the local path.
>
> How important is the repository URL in the title? It would be cool, if
> the repository URL (or at least the protocol) could be removed from
> the title bar. I think I would not need the repository URL, because
> the path inside the repository is what I'm working with and these are
> usually distinctive enough between projects. Opinions?
In my case local path is preferred. It usually contains (my) project
name (you cut it out) - which may be tsvn instead of
tortoisesvn.google.com, I set our company project into "cryptic" named
repositories, while this works good for me, my colleague uses "devel
names" and once we put docs to svn other team will use project
commercial name for WC. They would don't care where it is and what
technology is behind it, we just lern them how to use it.
Also it happen to me that I'm comiting to same (mostly ext) path from
different WCs and checking what changes are and if they don't overlap, etc.
--
Oto BREZINA, Printflow s.r.o., EU
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757&dsMessageId=2738167
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2011-05-16 11:26:30 CEST